Daily Archives: April 10, 2012

Contaminated drinking water news: Research shows metal exposure from laundered shop towels may exceed permissible levels set by the EPA for metals in drinking water.

Save the water news posting


Current News Postings
Originally Posted
Media Contact
Laura Kempke/Andrew Law
Schwartz MSL Boston
781-684-0770
The material posted here is compliments of
The above named author
This is shared
as educational
material only

savethewater


Despite many successful water projects, billions of people still lack adequate water and sanitation.
 
For your surfing pleasure
here are some new links in our revamped web site:

Educational
Current Sponsors
Photo Gallery
Videos
Events
Resources
Would You Like To Join Our
Link Exchange:

Join Us Here

 
Would You Like To Become A Sponsor:
Sponsor Info

Contact Us



 
savethewater”,

 
To Donate A Gift Please Contact Us 

Contaminated drinking water news:

New Research Shows Metal Exposure From Laundered Shop Towels May Exceed Permissible Levels Set by the EPA for Metals in Drinking Water

Presented at the Society of Toxicology Annual Meeting and ToxExpo, Gradient study advances research regarding metal residues, such as lead, on shop towels after commercial laundering
SAN FRANCISCO, March 14, 2012 /PRNewswire/ —

Gradient, a nationally recognized environmental and risk science consulting firm, today presented new data that show metal exposure from use of laundered shop towels may exceed the permissible levels allowed in drinking water. Gradient presented a poster describing its findings at the annual Society of Toxicology Annual Meeting and ToxExpo, which is taking place from March 11 through 15 in San Francisco. The poster describes exposure to metals on shop towels and compares the exposure to toxicity criteria established by governmental agencies. Millions of manufacturing workers routinely use shop towels on the job.

According to the new research, manufacturing workers using a typical number of shop towels may be exposed to metals such as lead, chromium, cadmium and antimony at levels many times above those allowed by the maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) or, in the case of lead, the action level (AL) for drinking water. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promulgates drinking water standards under the Safe Water Drinking Act to protect public health. An MCL, or AL for lead, is a legally enforceable limit which drinking water must meet. Suppliers of drinking water such as municipalities must address exceedances of MCLs, or the AL for lead, by taking corrective action and informing consumers.

“Our analysis indicates that shop towel users may unknowingly ingest higher amounts of metals than what is allowed in drinking water,” said Barbara Beck, Ph.D., DABT, principal at Gradient. “It is important for safety managers and plant workers to understand metal contamination levels in laundered shop towels so they can make informed decisions about their use.”

Workers May Unknowingly Ingest Heavy Metals from Contaminated Shop Towels

As recognized by multiple federal agencies such as the U.S. EPA, people can transfer contaminants from their hands to their mouths and ultimately ingest the invisible residues. The new Gradient analysis presented at the Society of Toxicology meeting compares the potential for heavy metal ingestion from shop towels to levels that may be consumed in water at drinking water limits. In the case of lead, daily intake from shop towels may be up to 21 times higher than the intake that would be associated with the lead action level.

Freshly laundered shop towels have been shown to be contaminated with metal residues, which may transfer to the hand during common usage, and can migrate to the mouth and be ingested at levels which exceed those allowed in drinking water.

The MCL and AL analysis advances Gradient’s research, which has been ongoing since 2003. Gradient has found that workers using the typical number of shop towels daily were exposed to seven metals — antimony, beryllium, cadmium, cobalt, copper, lead and molybdenum — that may exceed health-based limits. The same study found heavy metal residues in all of the laundered shop towels tested.

Kimberly-Clark Professional commissioned the 2011 Gradient study and the research presented by Gradient at the Society of Toxicology meeting. Both studies are based on analysis of data from laundered shop towels submitted by 26 North American manufacturing companies to an independent testing lab.

For more information, go to http://www.thedirtonshoptowels.com/.

About Gradient

Gradient is an environmental and risk science consulting firm with nationally recognized specialties in toxicology, epidemiology, risk assessment, product safety, contaminant fate and transport, and environmental chemistry. It assists national and global clients in resolving their complex problems relating to chemicals in the environment, in the workplace and in consumer products. Gradient’s principals and senior scientists are nationally recognized experts and active contributors to the promotion of sound science. For more information, go to www.gradientcorp.com.

Media Contact

Laura Kempke/Andrew Law
Schwartz MSL Boston
781-684-0770
lkempke@schwartzmsl.com or alaw@schwartzmsl.com [/justify] 
 
 
 

Please Contact Us

Topic Categories

Current Posts

Comments Off

Contaminated water news: Example of chemical contamination in the water – Example California nitrates.

Save the Water Helps Answer Questions

Save the Water™
Questions and Answers
Originally Posted
ENN
Farms or Industry Pollution?
The material posted here is compliments of
The above named author
This is shared
as educational
material only


Despite many successful water projects, billions of people still lack adequate water and sanitation.
 
For your surfing pleasure
here are some new links in our revamped web site:

Educational
Current Sponsors
Photo Gallery
Videos
Events
Resources
Would You Like To Join Our
Link Exchange:

Join Us Here

 
Would You Like To Become A Sponsor:
Sponsor Info

Contact Us



 
savethewater”,

 
To Donate A Gift Please Contact Us 

Farms or Industry Pollution?

Published March 14, 2012 11:27 AM

California Nitrates

Nitrates are a common water pollutant most often associated with agricultural effluent and excess fertilizer. It is a common issue in many locations. One in 10 people living in California’s most productive agricultural areas is at risk of exposure to harmful levels of nitrate contamination in their drinking water, according to a report released today by the University of California, Davis. The report was commissioned by the California State Water Resources Control Board.

The report, “Addressing Nitrate in California’s Drinking Water,” is the first comprehensive scientific investigation of nitrate contamination in the Tulare Lake Basin, which includes Fresno and Bakersfield, and the Salinas Valley, which includes Salinas and areas near Monterey.

Nutrients from human activities tend to travel from land to either surface or ground water. Nitrates in particular are removed through storm drains, sewage pipes, and other forms of surface runoff. Nutrient losses in runoff and leachate are often associated with agriculture. Modern agriculture often involves the application of nutrients onto fields in order to maximize production. However, farmers frequently apply more nutrients than are taken up by crops or pastures.

“Cleaning up nitrate in groundwater is a complex problem with no single solution,” said Jay Lund, director of the UC Davis Center for Watershed Sciences and a report co-author.

Nitrogen in organic and synthetic fertilizers has dramatically increased crop production in California in recent decades. However, excess nitrate in groundwater from surface nitrogen use has been linked to thyroid illnesses, some cancers and reproductive problems.

In their new report, UC Davis scientists examine data from wastewater treatment plants, septic systems, parks, lawns, golf courses and farms. The report concludes that more than 90 percent of human-generated nitrate contamination of groundwater in these basins is from agricultural activity.

The nitrate study area includes four of the nation’s five counties with the largest agricultural production, representing 40 percent of California’s irrigated cropland and more than half of the state’s confined animal farming industry.

Much of that excess is only now beginning to affect water quality in the Tulare Lake Basin and Monterey County portion of the Salinas Valley.

Fixes for drinking water systems in these basins could cost about $20 million to $35 million per year for decades, the report concluded. As nitrates continue to spread, drinking water system costs could increase for Tulare Lake Basin and Salinas Valley communities. The following treatment method(s) have proven to be effective for removing nitrate to below 10 mg/L or 10 ppm: ion exchange, reverse osmosis, electrodialysis.

The UC Davis report outlines several potential funding solutions, including a fee on nitrogen fertilizer use to help fund drinking water costs.

The report found that 10 percent of the 2.6 million people in the Tulare Lake Basin and Salinas Valley rely on groundwater that may exceed the nitrate standard of 45 milligrams per liter set by the California Department of Public Health for public water systems. The problem is likely to worsen for decades, as nitrogen applied to today’s crops slowly makes its way into groundwater as nitrate.

Communities often respond to initial contamination by drilling a new well or shifting to cleaner water sources. But as high nitrate concentrations continue to persist, communities are faced with using expensive treatment and alternatives.

Key findings included:

Drinking water supply actions, such as water treatment and finding alternative water supplies, are most cost-effective. However, well supplies will become less available as nitrate pollution continues to spread.

Agricultural fertilizers and animal manure applied to cropland are the two largest regional sources of nitrate leached to groundwater — representing more than 90 percent of the total.

Reducing nitrate in the groundwater is possible, with methods such as improved fertilizer management and water treatment.

For further information and photo:http://www.news.ucdavis.edu/search/news_detail.lasso?id=10164

 
 
 

Topic Categories

Current Posts

Comments Off

Drinking water news: Lenny Kravitz is supporting UNICEF’s programs for water.

Save the water news posting


Save the Water™
Current News Postings
Originally Posted By
Lenny Kravitz, special to HLN
updated 8:29 AM EDT,
Thu March 29, 2012
Lenny Kravitz Is Supporting UNICEF’s Programs For Water
The material posted here is compliments of
The above named author
This is shared
as educational material only


Despite many successful water projects, billions of people still lack adequate water and sanitation.
 
For your surfing pleasure
here are some new links in our revamped web site:

Educational
Current Sponsors
Photo Gallery
Videos
Events
Resources
Would You Like To Join Our
Link Exchange:

Join Us Here

 
Would You Like To Become A Sponsor:
Sponsor Info

Contact Us



 
savethewater”,

 
To Donate A Gift Please Contact Us 

Lenny Kravitz: Everyone deserves clean water

By Lenny Kravitz, special to HLN
updated 8:29 AM EDT, Thu March 29, 2012
NEED TO KNOW
  • Lenny Kravitz is supporting UNICEF’s programs for water
  • UNICEF: 780+ million have poor access no drinking water
  • Kravitz: ‘Great progress has been made, but it is not a time to declare victory’
Drinking water news- Lenny Kravitz is supporting UNICEFs programs for water.
Lenny Kravitz is a Grammy award-winning singer-songwriter, record producer and actor starring in “The Hunger Games”. He is a spokesperson forUNICEF’s clean water campaign.

Last week, I signed on to support UNICEF’s programs for water, sanitation and hygiene. On the same day, UNICEF announced that the Millennium Development Goal on drinking water had been met, and that now 89% of the world’s population has access to drinking water.

I thought I had joined too late, when I was no longer needed!

There is no doubt this is a remarkable achievement. But if you read the WHO/UNICEFProgress on Drinking Water and Sanitation 2012 report carefully, it also means 11% of the world has no access to improved drinking water sources – more than 780 million people. For me and for UNICEF, this means we will have a lot to work on together.

On sanitation, the picture is even bleaker. Approximately two and a half billion people do not have access to improved sanitation facilities.

Surprisingly, those left behind are not only from poor countries. Sub-Saharan Africa, for example, accounts for less than half of the population still without water and sanitation.

In reality, people in the big economic powerhouses are falling behind too. China and India, with vibrant and growing economies, together have over one third of all the people in the world. They have the means to make progress and have done so. Since 1990, 522 million people in India, and 457 million in China gained access to improved water sources, and so they account for nearly half of the global progress towards the MDG target. And more than 95% of the progress on sanitation in Eastern Asia is due to China.

But I was shocked to realize that 119 million people in China and 97 million people in India still do not have access to safe drinking water. Even more astonishingly, roughlyhalf the population of India, 626 million people, have no sanitation facilities, and have to resort to open defecation. In fact the number of people who practice open defecation in India is more than twice the number in the next 18 countries combined. In Russia, 40 million people don’t have access to what the UN calls “improved” sanitation, and neither do 40 million people in Brazil.

UNICEF has been talking about equity for some time now, and when I see the water and sanitation figures I totally get what they mean.

While the richest members of the population in many countries are enjoying the fruits of progress, the poorest are still living in the last century, with the same challenges their grandparents faced.

Far away from the glittering lights of Bollywood, and the industrial parks of Hyderabad, the poor children of rural communities in India are dying of preventable diarrhea, defecating in the open, and getting their drinking water from dirty ponds, pools and rivers. Similarly, while in Chengdu or Shenzhen, China, those manufacturing computers may take progress for granted, in the hinterland, the children of poor farmers still have no drinking water.

I am not trying to throw bricks at India, China, or the others, but basically saying that even in countries with adequate financial resources many people are lagging behind.

Unless we target the hardest to reach, and the most disadvantaged, they will continue to miss out on the benefits of progress. The report shows that it is the poorest people, mostly living in rural areas, who are falling through the cracks into an abyss of neglect.

In a 2010 resolution, the UN recognized safe drinking water and sanitation as a human right — meaning they should be available to every person. But there is still a long way to go in order to fulfill the promise implicit in the resolution.

So, yes, great progress has been made. This is certainly a time to evoke a sense of hope from that progress. But, as UNICEF has said, it is not a time to declare victory. Now is the time to put our energies in the final push to ensure that every person — most especially including every child—has clean water and adequate sanitation facilities. It is the right thing to do.

 
 
 
 

Topic Categories

Current Posts

Comments Off

Drinking water contamination: CAMP LEJEUNE, N.C. – Contaminated drinking water news: Archives Trichloroethylene (TCE) causes cancer, found in drinking water.

http://savethewater.org/category/save-the-water-archives/


Archived Postings
Originally Posted By: ALEX FREEDMAN Eyewitness News 9
Published: September 30, 2011
Updated: September 30, 2011 – 6:25 PM
EPA Report: Trichloroethylene causes cancer, found in drinking water | Eyewitness News 9.
The material posted here is compliments of
The above named author
This is shared
as educational material only


Despite many successful water projects, billions of people still lack adequate water and sanitation.
 
For your surfing pleasure
here are some new links in our revamped web site:

Educational
Current Sponsors
Photo Gallery
Videos
Events
Resources
Would You Like To Join Our
Link Exchange:

Join Us Here

 
Would You Like To Become A Sponsor:
Sponsor Info

Contact Us



 
savethewater”,

 
To Donate A Gift Please Contact Us 

Contaminated drinking water news:

EPA Report: Trichloroethylene causes cancer, found in drinking water.

CAMP LEJEUNE, N.C. – A toxic chemical found to be in drinking water at Camp Lejeune back in the eighties is linked to cancer.

It’s a story that Nine on Your Side has been investigating for years. Some people have been waiting on this study for 20 years – during which time – have developed cancer after drinking tap water at Camp Lejeune.

A total of 2,900 claims have been filed in relation to health problems and drinking the toxic tap water. Claims now backed by a federal agency.

“The EPA’s change in designation of TCE from a probably carcinogen to a known carcinogen will not change our approach to Camp Lejeune historical drinking water,” said Capt. Kendra Hardesty, spokeswoman for Camp Lejeune.

It’s toxic drinking water believed to contain Tricholorethylene or TCE, now proven by the environment protection agency to be linked to cancer characterizing TCE as “carcinogenic to humans.”

Between the 1950s and 1980s people who lived on base at Camp Lejeune, drank and even breathed in the chemical.

Reports say it leaked from tanks at the Hadnot Point fuel farm and into underground drinking water.

The EPA going as far as to say movement of TCE from the soil to drinking water and finally to the air is a “serious concern.”

“We’re still supporting the scientific organizations because we want to find answers as much as they do,” said Hardesty.

It’s a search for answers coming 20 years after the first victims like retired Marine Jerry Ensminger started to come forward. A slow process, he says, but a step forward nonetheless.

“This has taken 20 plus years to get this one risk assessment on this one chemical out. 20 plus years,” said Ensminger.

Camp Lejeune along with the Navy are doing their own research on the water contamination, but still maintain that the drinking water on base meets all the EPA standards.

“Well I want the Marine Corp and the Department of the Navy to step up to the plate and live up to their rhetoric. I want them to truly take care of their own,” said Ensminger.

Ensminger blames the Department of Defense for, what he says, is trying to hide what is being considered the largest recorded environmental incident on a domestic Department of Defense installation.

Now that the truth is out about TCE, Ensminger hopes the estimated 750,000 people who may have been exposed to the carcinogen between the 1950s and 1980s will get the compensation he says they deserve.

In a statement from Senator Richard Burr released Friday, he says, “While this is an important step towards providing care for those who suffer adverse health effects resulting from exposure to toxic water at Camp Lejeune, we still have a long way to go.”

Burr potentially referring to his Caring for Veterans Act, meant to provid that compensation, but has now all but disappeared in congress bureaucracy.

To read the full EPA summary of the assessment, enter the keywords: TCE Report right here on WNCT.com.

via EPA Report: Trichloroethylene causes cancer, found in drinking water | Eyewitness News 9.

 
 
 
 

Comments Off

Drinking water contamination: Camp Lejeune: male breast cancer reports likely to grow.

 Camp Lejeune. ATSDR case control study see if these breast cancer numbers are abnormally high among this group, Drinking water contamination news. Save the water  Volume 3

 Camp Lejeune. The ATSDR is considering launching a case control study see if these breast cancer numbers are abnormally high among this group,Save the water,current post

Update
Vol.III
Archived Postings
Originally Posted
Posted on November 29, 2011
posted in
Camp Lejeune Toxic Water
Updated
July 16
2012

 What is contaminated water at Camp Lejeune<br /><br />
” width=”100″ height=”129″ /></a></p>
<p> </p>
<p><center><br />
The material posted is<br />
courtesy of<br />
Save the Water™<br />
Water Research<br />
Education Dept.<br />
and is shared as<br />
educational material only</center><br />
<a href= contaminated water at Camp Lejeune caused breast cancer?,Drinking water contamination news


,Contaminated drinking Water


Rating for savethewater.org

Drinking water contamination – Camp Lejeune archives

Camp Lejeune: male breast cancer reports likely to grow.

|by:NewsInferno

Posted on November 29, 2011 by Laurie

This entry was posted in Camp Lejeune Toxic Water. Bookmark the permalink..

It is believed that cases of male breast cancer tied to contaminated drinking water at the Camp Lejeune Marine Corps base in North Carolina will rise in number. According to a report from the St. Petersburg Times, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) confirmed last week that 184 male Marine Corps veterans with a history of breast cancer have already been identified in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) records. Now the agency is trying to determine how many of those men may have been exposed to Camp Lejeun’s toxic drinking water during their career.

According to the St. Petersburg Times, some members of a panel advising ATSDR on Camp Lejeune believe as many as half of the 184 male breast cancer victims identified thus far may have served at the base. Richard Clapp, an epidemiologist and panel member, told the St. Petersburg Times that 40 percent or more was a plausible estimate as to how many of the 184 Marines with male breast cancer might have ties to Lejeune.

Only about 38 percent of the VA database has been searched thus for male beast cancer victims. As a result, the number could increase significantly by the time ATSDR completes its investigation.

From the mid-1950s to the mid-1980s, an estimated 1 million people were exposed to water that was poisoned by benzene, trichloroethylene (TCE), tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and vinyl chloride, which the Department of the Navy eventually blamed on an off base dry cleaner. As we’ve reported in the past, many scientists have called the drinking water contamination at Camp Lejeune the worst in the nation’s history.

Recently, lawsuits involving toxic water at Camp Lejeune were consolidated in a multidistrict litigation and transferred to the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia. These lawsuits allege that the U.S. government knowingly exposed hundreds of thousands of Marines, sailors, their family members, and civilian employees to highly contaminated drinking water, and at the same time actively disseminated disinformation to victims in an effort to minimize the significance of the exposure.

“How many men do you have to find with breast cancer to accept that the water poisoned us?” asked Jack Partain, a Tallahassee insurance investigator who also serves on the advisory panel, told the St. Petersburg Times. “How many bodies do you have to stack up? People should be enraged by this.”

Partain, himself a breast cancer survivor, was born at Camp Lejeune and was exposed to the toxic water as a small child. He told the St. Petersburg Times that he has tracked down 73 other men – including a dozen who never served in the Marines – who were once Camp Lejeune residents who have also had breast cancer.

It should be noted that breast cancer in men is exceedingly rare, with only one in 100,000 men diagnosed with the disease.

Unfortunately, VA data does not reflect cases among civilians who lived and worked at Camp Lejeune. The ATSDR is considering launching a case control study see if these breast cancer numbers are abnormally high among this group.

Next year, a clearer picture of the health consequences associated with Camp Lejeune might emerge if, as planned, the ATSDR releases a study comparing Lejeune residents with a control group at Camp Pendelton in California. The study is comparing the mortality rates associated with a list of disease, including breast cancer, between the two groups.

This entry was posted in Camp Lejeune Toxic Water. Bookmark the permalink

via Camp Lejeune Male Breast Cancer Reports Likely to Grow | NewsInferno.

  • How to navigate STW ™ postings:
    View monthly posting’s calendar, become a subscriber or obtain RSS feed by going to the bottom index of this page.
  • Explanation of Index:
  • This Months Postings: Calendar on left displays articles and pages posted on a given day.
  • Current and Archived Postings: Click on the month you want to view. Most current article for the month will appear at top of screen.
  • RSS Links : Obtain your RSS feeds.
  • Subscribe: Subscribe to postings by entering your e-mail address and confirming your e-mail.


Help Save the Water™ – click here.

 

Water will never catch the public eye until it stops running out of the faucet, Bill Segal stated during interview.

 

Click here to see what Bill Segal and ostrich are talking about
Get your head out of the ground the water crisis is not going away


Water news archives. Table of contents – 150 articles – April~July 2012

Supporting water research and the education program’s growth of Save the Water™ is vital to our future generation’s health, your funding is needed.

Comments Off

Contaminated drinking water news: Archives – arsenic in juice – What’s for dinner?

Savethewater Archives


Archived Postings
Originally Posted
Arsenic in Juice 12/4/11
I’m Martha Koloski
with today’s On Your Side
(Copyright 2011 by WKBT News8000.com)

via Arsenic in Juice 12/4/11 | What’s For Dinner – Home.

The material posted here is compliments of
The above named author
This is shared
as educational material only


 

savethewater”,

Contaminated drinking water news:

Arsenic in Juice 12/4/11 | What’s For Dinner – Home

Consumer Reports just tested apple and grape juice and found worrisome levels of arsenic in a number of samples – worrisome considering how much fruit juice many children drink.

Zoe Hamilton limits how much juice she gives her daughters because she’s concerned about the “empty calories.” But there are other serious reasons for concern. Consumer Reports tested 28 apple juices and three grape juices purchased in the New York metropolitan area. Of the 88 samples analyzed, ten percent had arsenic levels that exceeded federal standards for bottled and municipal water.

“The majority of the arsenic detected was the inorganic form – a known carcinogen linked to skin, bladder, and lung cancer.” And with 12 juices Consumer Reports tested, at least one sample contained lead levels that exceeded standards for bottled water. Urvashi Rangan,

“Our test was limited, so we can’t draw any conclusions about any particular type or brand of juice. But the higher levels of arsenic and lead we found are troubling because many children drink a lot of juice, and their small body size makes them particularly vulnerable.” One likely source of the contamination is pesticides containing arsenic that were used in agriculture. Even though most are now banned, they can remain in the soil. The advocacy arm of Consumer Reports is urging the Food and Drug Administration to set standards for juice.

Urvashi Rangan, “We think the lead limits should be five parts per billion, the current standards for bottled water, or even lower. And for arsenic – three parts per billion. That’s attainable. 41 percent of the samples we tested met both those levels.

” The Juice Products Association told Consumer Reports: “We are committed to providing nutritious and safe fruit juices … and will comply with limits” established by the Food and Drug Administration. For now, Consumer Reports says the best advice for parents is to do what Zoe does and limit how much juice your children drink. The Food and Drug Administration told Consumer Reports it’s reviewing its own data to see if guidelines for juice should be set.

It turns out the F-D-A has found levels of arsenic in apple juice that are even higher than what Consumer Reports’ tests discovered.

I’m Martha Koloski with today’s On Your Side..”

(Copyright 2011 by WKBT News8000.com)

via Arsenic in Juice 12/4/11 | What’s For Dinner – Home.
 
 
 
 

Comments Off
Do you need quick support ?

Welcome

* required
Send Message