Questions and Answers
Farms or Industry Pollution?
The material posted here is compliments of
The above named author
This is shared
Despite many successful water projects, billions of people still lack adequate water and sanitation.
For your surfing pleasure
here are some new links in our revamped web site:
Would You Like To Join Our
Would You Like To Become A Sponsor:
[/one_fifth] [four_fifth_last] [justify]
Farms or Industry Pollution?
Published March 14, 2012 11:27 AM
The report, “Addressing Nitrate in California’s Drinking Water,” is the first comprehensive scientific investigation of nitrate contamination in the Tulare Lake Basin, which includes Fresno and Bakersfield, and the Salinas Valley, which includes Salinas and areas near Monterey.
Nutrients from human activities tend to travel from land to either surface or ground water. Nitrates in particular are removed through storm drains, sewage pipes, and other forms of surface runoff. Nutrient losses in runoff and leachate are often associated with agriculture. Modern agriculture often involves the application of nutrients onto fields in order to maximize production. However, farmers frequently apply more nutrients than are taken up by crops or pastures.
“Cleaning up nitrate in groundwater is a complex problem with no single solution,” said Jay Lund, director of the UC Davis Center for Watershed Sciences and a report co-author.
Nitrogen in organic and synthetic fertilizers has dramatically increased crop production in California in recent decades. However, excess nitrate in groundwater from surface nitrogen use has been linked to thyroid illnesses, some cancers and reproductive problems.
In their new report, UC Davis scientists examine data from wastewater treatment plants, septic systems, parks, lawns, golf courses and farms. The report concludes that more than 90 percent of human-generated nitrate contamination of groundwater in these basins is from agricultural activity.
The nitrate study area includes four of the nation’s five counties with the largest agricultural production, representing 40 percent of California’s irrigated cropland and more than half of the state’s confined animal farming industry.
Much of that excess is only now beginning to affect water quality in the Tulare Lake Basin and Monterey County portion of the Salinas Valley.
Fixes for drinking water systems in these basins could cost about $20 million to $35 million per year for decades, the report concluded. As nitrates continue to spread, drinking water system costs could increase for Tulare Lake Basin and Salinas Valley communities. The following treatment method(s) have proven to be effective for removing nitrate to below 10 mg/L or 10 ppm: ion exchange, reverse osmosis, electrodialysis.
The UC Davis report outlines several potential funding solutions, including a fee on nitrogen fertilizer use to help fund drinking water costs.
The report found that 10 percent of the 2.6 million people in the Tulare Lake Basin and Salinas Valley rely on groundwater that may exceed the nitrate standard of 45 milligrams per liter set by the California Department of Public Health for public water systems. The problem is likely to worsen for decades, as nitrogen applied to today’s crops slowly makes its way into groundwater as nitrate.
Communities often respond to initial contamination by drilling a new well or shifting to cleaner water sources. But as high nitrate concentrations continue to persist, communities are faced with using expensive treatment and alternatives.
Key findings included:
Drinking water supply actions, such as water treatment and finding alternative water supplies, are most cost-effective. However, well supplies will become less available as nitrate pollution continues to spread.
Agricultural fertilizers and animal manure applied to cropland are the two largest regional sources of nitrate leached to groundwater — representing more than 90 percent of the total.
Reducing nitrate in the groundwater is possible, with methods such as improved fertilizer management and water treatment.
For further information and photo:http://www.news.ucdavis.edu/search/news_detail.lasso?id=10164
[justify] [/justify][/four_fifth_last] [/four_fifth] [one_fifth_last]
Drinking Water News (39)
Misc Water Issues (19)
- What Is Fracking (2)
- Environmental Engineering Pioneers Innovative Clean Water Sources
- Save the Water™ Answers the Question What Are American Cities With the Worst Drinking Water
- Save the Water™ Archives News Branson Tri-Lakes 5 Area Water Systems Fail To Monitor In 3rd Quarter
- Save the Water™ Archives ‘Miracle Tree’ Substance Produces Clean Drinking Water Inexpensively And Sustainably
- Save the Water™ Archives China Struggles With Drinking Water As Floods Rise
- The Importance of World Water Day
- UN Hits Water Target, But 1.8 Billion People Still Drinking Unsafe Water
- Save the Water™ Answers What Are Some Of Current Histories Worse Water Disasters
- NORTH SEA: Elgin Gas Leak
- CEO Discusses The Water Crisis
- Save the Water™ Archives Nearly 140 Oklahoma Water Supplies Violate Codes – Tulsa, OK
- Oil Company to Jackson County Residents: We Don’t Frack
- Save the Water™ Archives Do You Know What’s In Your Tap Water?
- Save the Water™ Archives Water Management: The Path to a Better Future
- What Is The Truth About Chloramines in Water
- How Power Company Was Permitted To Poison River