Canadian British Columbia Water Crisis Issues [Warrior Publications] [Definitive EPA : State Tribal Programs Directory Included]

Posted in: Drinking Water News, Health effects, Uncategorized, Water Contamination
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


News Posting


Despite many successful water projects, billions of people still lack adequate water and sanitation


For your surfing
pleasure here
are some links in our revamped web site

Educational All Levels
Current Sponsors
Join Our Link Exchange

Help fund STW™ laboratory by shopping on line at our store
Become A Sponsor
To Donate A Gift
Please Contact Us

The material posted is
compliments of
Jennifer Moreau,
Sam Cooper,
Peter Ewart,
The Province,
Pacific Free Press,
Burnaby Now,
CBC News,
Warrior Publications
and is shared as
educational material only

Water Crisis Issues: British Columbia Canada

May 26, 2012

Kinder Morgan’s Burnaby Pipeline Path Revealed

Kinder Morgan’s Trans Mountain pipeline and proposed expansion brings Tar Sands oil to Burrard Inlet refinery, where it is shipped out on oil tankers.

Burnaby-Douglas MP Kennedy Stewart has released a map outlining the path of Kinder Morgan’s Trans Mountain pipeline, which runs beneath Burnaby backyards and major roadways. A PDF of the map can be viewed here: Kinder Morgan Transmountain GVRD map Continue reading →

First Nations Ready For Fight Against Disease Lake’s Red Chris Mine

By SAM COOPER, The Province, May 5, 2012

After the province green-lighted a gold and copper mine, which promises to bring 250 jobs to northwestern B.C., a First Nations group has signaled intent to fight the project because of “major contamination risk.” Continue reading →

Leave a Comment

Filed under Mining



Tagged as , , , , , ,





May 15, 2012

Shell Moves Closer To Kitimat LNG Terminal

CBC News, May 15, 2012

Aerial view of Kitimat, ‘BC’, proposed site of natural gas facilities and port to export the gas to foreign markets.

Royal Dutch Shell says it has given a tentative go ahead for a liquefied natural gas project in Kitimat, B.C., alongside three Asian Partners.
The Anglo-Dutch energy giant says it will have a 40-per-cent stake in the project, called LNG Canada.
PetroChina, Mitsubishi Corp. and Korea Gas Corp. will each hold a 20-per-cent interest. Continue reading →

May 8, 2012

Spill! What Spill? DFO Denies Extent of Hartley Bay Fouling‏

Hartley Bay oil spill – a tanker in a tea cup?

by Peter Ewart, Pacific Free Press, May 6, 2012

The oil spill in Grenville Channel, near the remote village of Hartley Bay on the Pacific Ocean – just a tempest in a teacup?

At least that’s the argument a Federal government Fisheries and Ocean official appears to be pushing when he claims the entire spill may only be “about one-tenth of a litre in volume” (Globe and Mail, May 2).

But the First Nations people in Hartley Bay and the commercial pilots flying over the region are saying something very different. According to them, the spill is “between two and five miles long and 200 feet wide.” Continue reading →


[/four_fifth_last] [/four_fifth] [one_fifth_last]

Search Site

Hot Topics

Current Posts

[/one_fifth_last] [three_fourth]

Tribal Water Resource Directory

+ opens topic menu
– closes topic menu
[toggle title=”Tribal Programs – Drinking Water” height=”auto”]

Tribal Programs – Drinking Water

On this page

[/toggle] [toggle title=”Information for Tribal Public Water Suppliers
” height=”auto”]

Information for Tribal Public Water Suppliers

[/toggle] [toggle title=”Rule Monitoring Placards ” height=”auto”] Rule Monitoring Placards – check to make sure you download the correct placard for your public water system type PDF

[/toggle] [toggle title=” Tribal Drinking Water Operator Certification
” height=”auto”]

Tribal Drinking Water Operator Certification Program



[/toggle] [toggle title=” Tribal Drinking Water Compliance Information
” height=”auto”]

Tribal Drinking Water Compliance Information

Each compliance report discusses the violations at public water systems on Indian reservations; EPA’s enforcement and compliance assistance activities with respect to Tribal PWSs; and the financial assistance EPA has provided to facilitate the provision of safe drinking water to Tribes.

  • EPA Annual Compliance Reports
[/toggle] [toggle title=” Drinking Water Training for Tribes and Tribal Operators
” height=”auto”]

Drinking Water Training for Tribes and Tribal Operators

[/toggle] [toggle title=” Tribal Drinking Water Needs ” height=”auto”]

Tribal Drinking Water Needs

[/toggle] [toggle title=” Funding Opportunities
” height=”auto”]

Funding Opportunities

Drinking Water Infrastructure Grants Tribal Set-Aside (DWIG TSA) Program Guidance PDF (34 pp, 98K) [/toggle] [toggle title=” Links ” height=”auto”]

[/toggle] [toggle title=” Tribal PWSS & UIC Programs
” height=”auto”]

Tribal PWSS & UIC Programs



History of the Tribal PWSS and UIC Programs

In 1974 the United States Congress passed legislation, the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), designed to maintain and improve the quality of the nation’s drinking waters. Two major regulatory programs were created in the SDWA: the Public Water System Supervision (PWSS) and the Underground Injection Control (UIC) programs.

Congress authorized EPA to delegate responsibilities to states for implementing and enforcing national standards within their jurisdiction. States must apply to EPA if they want this “primacy” responsibility and must develop PWSS or UIC programs that meet national requirements. EPA is still responsible for developing national regulations, overseeing state primacy programs and implementing programs in states without primacy.

Because of their unique status, Indian tribes were not eligible to assume primacy in the original Act. Instead EPA regions were responsible for primary enforcement authority of PWSS and UIC programs on Tribal lands. This changed in 1986 when the Amendments to the SDWA added provisions that allow federally recognized tribes to assume primacy for the PWSS and UIC programs. Section 1451 (“Indian Tribes”) of SDWA authorizes the EPA to treat Indian tribes in a manner similar to states and to assign primary enforcement responsibility (primacy) to qualified tribes.

The PWSS and UIC programs are very complex and costly to operate. For many tribes (especially those that do not have a large number of public water systems or underground injection wells), the costs and resources required to achieve and maintain a regulatory program may far exceed the benefits from achieving primacy. Due to such difficulties, currently the only tribe that has sought and obtained primacy for the PWSS program is the Navajo Nation. There are a few tribes that are pursuing primacy in the PWSS and UIC programs.

Today´s Tribal Direct Implementation Program

States and tribes that do not obtain PWSS and UIC program delegation continue to be directly implemented by the EPA region in which the State or reservation is located. All EPA regions, excluding Region III (which has no federally recognized tribes), operate tribal PWSS and UIC programs to manage public water systems or underground injection wells on Indian lands.

EPA’s 1997 inventory shows that there are nearly 1000 public water systems (740 community water systems, 90 nontransient noncommunity water systems and 130 transient noncommunity water systems) that the EPA regional offices manage on Indian lands serving a population of nearly 500,000. There are also over 5,300 injection wells (one Class I well, 4,300 Class II wells, 0 Class III wells and 1,042 Class V wells) on tribal lands that are managed by regional UIC staff.

As the primary enforcement authority for tribal public water systems, EPA regions are responsible for enforcing against those systems that do not comply with federal drinking water regulations. A formal enforcement action is taken as a last measure. EPA regions dedicate a great deal of resources to provide tribes with technical assistance to help their systems or wells comply with federal standards. Regional staff visit reservations as often as possible to provide compliance assistance on site. Many Regions also fund circuit rider programs which enable other qualified persons the opportunity to provide technical assistance and training directly to tribes.

For more information on the Tribal PWSS and UIC programs, please contact your program representative.

[/toggle] [toggle title=” Source water assessment and protection programs ” height=”auto”]

Source Water Assessment and Protection Programs

The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) Amendments of 1996 required states to develop and implement source water assessment programs (SWAPs) to analyze existing and potential threats to the quality of the public drinking water throughout the state. Using these programs, most states have completed source water assessments for every public water system — from major metropolitan areas to the smallest towns. Even schools, restaurants, and other public facilities that have wells or surface water supplies have been assessed. A source water assessment is a study and report, unique to a water system, that provides basic information about the water used to provide drinking water. States are working with local communities and public water systems to identify protection measures to address potential threats to sources of drinking water.

EPA publications and resources

[/toggle] [toggle title=”Wellhead protection program” height=”auto”]

Wellhead Protection Program

The Wellhead Protection Program (WHPP) is a pollution prevention and management program used to protect underground sources of drinking water. The national WHPP was established under section 1428 of the 1986 SDWA amendments. The law specified that certain program activities, such as delineation, contaminant source inventory, contingency planning and source management, be incorporated into state WHPPs, which are approved by EPA prior to implementation. All states have EPA-approved state WHPPs. Although section 1428 applies only to states, a number of tribes are implementing the program as well.

WHPPs provided the foundation for many of the state source water assessment programs required under the 1996 SDWA amendments. Most states also use the wellhead protection program as a foundation for assessing and protecting ground water systems. State WHPPs vary greatly. For example, some states require community water systems to develop management plans, while others rely on education and technical assistance to encourage voluntary action. Other states have mandatory requirements for wellhead protection at the local level. Guidance, publications and other resources are available on state source water web sites.

EPA publications and resources

Non-EPA publications and resources

  • Ground Water Foundation Workshop Guide:
    An Introduction to Drinking Water Source Assessment and Protection
    Exit EPA Disclaimer
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture: Home*A*Syst/Farm*A*Syst Exit EPA Disclaimer
[/toggle] [toggle title=”State ground water protection program” height=”auto”]

State Ground Water Protection Programs

Many states have also developed programs that are focused specifically on ground water protection. Several states developed formal Comprehensive State Ground Water Protection Programs (CSGWPP), which were designed as a management tool for states to use to integrate all programs that affect ground water quality, thus allowing better decisions to be made. Although most states are no longer pursuing formal approval of a CSGW pp, virtually all states are pursuing at least some of the individual elements necessary for comprehensive ground water protection. Within EPA, the source water protection program is working with the underground storage tank program to address potential threats to ground water posed by leaking tanks.

Publications and resources

[/toggle] [toggle title=”Sole source aquifer protection program ” height=”auto”]

Sole Source Aquifer Protection Program

A sole source aquifer supplies 50 percent or more of the drinking water for a given aquifer service area for which there are no reasonably available alternative sources, should the aquifer become contaminated. Designation as a sole source aquifer protects an area’s ground water resources by requiring EPA to review any proposed projects within the designated area that are receiving federal financial assistance.

[/toggle] [toggle title=”Watershed-based protection program” height=”auto”]

Watershed-Based Protection Program

The goal of source water protection is to protect the drinking water resource by protecting and preserving the environmental quality of the watershed above the intake (or the aquifer around the well). The assessment is the first step in the process to protect the resource. Once a watershed has been assessed to determine its current condition and the extent of the threats to the system, a watershed plan can be developed and implemented.

EPA’s Office of Water has numerous programs that focus on watershed protection under the Clean Water Act (CWA). The Act includes programs such as the Nonpoint Source Program, National Estuary Program, the Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program, and the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Each of these programs encourage states to develop programs to promote watershed-based protection, and they have elements that support watershed-based planning and implementation. The federal programs are generally implemented at the state level.

[/toggle] [toggle title=”EPA, other federal and non-governmental programs ” height=”auto”]

EPA, Other Federal and Non-governmental Programs

There is no single federal program for implementing source water protection plans and activities. However, many federal, tribal, regional, and local programs have tools and resources that can be used to focus on protecting drinking water. Source water protection can benefit, and benefit from, other EPA programs, other federal programs and non-governmental programs:

  • Other programs can use source water assessments and identified protection areas to set priorities for ongoing prevention efforts.
  • Identifying source water protection areas increases federal, state and local managers’ awareness of other programs where participation might increase the protection of human health.
  • Protecting sources of drinking water can help various federal programs, states, organizations and communities meet other environmental and social goals, such as green space conservation, stormwater planning, management of nonpoint source pollution and brownfields redevelopment.
  • The benefits that EPA and other federal programs can provide to state and local source water assessment and protection efforts are potentially very large. These include information, technical and financial resources, and communication networks and enforcement authorities.

EPA program links

Other Federal Programs and Non-Governmenal Organizations

[/toggle] [toggle title=” Tribal programs ” height=”auto”]

Tribal Programs

EPA is firmly committed to helping tribes to assess the rivers, lakes, springs and aquifers that serve as tribal public water supplies and to implement measures to protect against contamination of these water resources.

You will need Adobe Reader to view some of the files on this page.
[/three_fourth] [one_fourth_last] [/one_fourth_last]
You will need Adobe Reader to view some of the files on this page.
[/three_fourth] [one_fourth_last]
Want to Donate?
Please contact us for gifts in kind - Mail your check to: P.O. Box 545934, Surfside, Fl 33154