Tag Archives: fracturing

Global water news: New tech said to clean up fracking water – Wastewater from fracking could be too much to handle – study says – John Roach series.

Save the water news education and water research postings

Save the Water™
Daily
News Brief

Courtesy of
John Roach
NBC News

Save the Water™
Water Research
Water Education
and is shared as
educational material only.AQUASQUAD LOGOWorld Water DayDILOS FUNDRAISINGMicrosope images width= A day in the life of a scientist DILOS program: youth education principles.Sponsor a program today.K-4 STEMContaminated drinking WaterPlease make your check payable to Save the Water, Inc. mail to: Singer and Falk Certified Public Accountants 777 Old Country Rd. Plainview, N.Y. 11803

 
 

Rating for savethewater.org

Global water news

New tech  and fracking water

New tech said to clean up fracking water.

Best viewed using Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, and Safari web browsers (not Internet Explorer).

A new water desalination technology may prove a savior for the oil and natural gas industries confronting growing concerns about the wastewater that flows to the surface in the months and years after a well is fracked.

In fracking, or hydraulic fracturing, operations 3 million to 5 million gallons of water are injected deep underground, along with sand and a chemical cocktail, to fracture shale rock and extract the embedded natural gas.

Some of that water returns to the surface immediately after the fracturing. The rest comes back over the course of months and years, which a recent study indicates could overwhelm the wastewater treatment infrastructure in the Marcellus Shale formation, which stretches from New York to Virginia.

The new desalination technology is not aimed at the large volumes of water that flow back just after a frack, but could work unattended by a human for months as it treats the really salty water to drinking-water quality, according to engineers working on the system.

The technique “is very much like an engineered version of what nature does in the rain cycle where seawater vaporizes, forms clouds in the atmosphere which condense and come down as rain,” John Lienhard, a mechanical engineer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, told NBC News.

“But what we’ve got is clearly a system that’s been designed to optimize performance and to minimize the amount of energy that is required to do the vaporization.”

Fracking waterWater from actual natural gas wells, sent to MIT by the companies that operate them, was run through the system, producing clean, potable water.

The system is a variation of the standard desalination process where salty water is vaporized and then condenses on a cold surface. The salt is separated out in the vaporization.

Lienhard and colleagues use what’s called a carrier gas process where water is sprayed onto warm air to vaporize it. This warm moist air, which carries pure water vapor, is bubbled through cool water where the vapor condenses.

While other researchers have developed so-called humidification dehumidification desalination systems, Lienhard and colleagues maintain that theirs is more energy efficient and comes with the advantages of having simple hardware, low maintenance, and is optimized to process between 1,200 and 2,400 liters a day.

That makes the technology well-suited for desalination in rural coastal villages in developing countries, which the researchers said was the inspiration for their research.

“And it turns out that those are very similar to the requirements that you have in dealing with water that is coming up in the oil and gas wells,” Lienhard said.

Hundreds of natural gas wells are distributed across landscapes such as the Marcellus Shale, the Bakken formation in North Dakota and the Permian Basin of West Texas.

Lienhard said he envisions the desalination plants at each individual well pad, processing hundreds to a few thousand liters of produced water per day at a cost of about “a couple of dollars per cubic meter.”

The team has filed for patents on the technology and launched a company to commercialize it.

“We hope to have a pilot plant running at a natural gas site within 12 months,” Lienhard said. “If the pilot works, then we could immediately scale it up.”

John Roach is a contributing writer for NBC News. To learn more about him, visit his website.

Wastewater from fracking could be too much to handle, study says.

In this file photo, a fracking fluid pit sits next to a drill site near Waynesburg, Pa.

Mladen Antonov  AFP  Getty Images

The practice of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, produces a relatively small amount of wastewater, given all the gas the technique recovers, according to a new analysis of operations in Pennsylvania. Nevertheless, the number of fracking operations has grown so rapidly that the wastewater being produced threatens to overwhelm the region’s capacity to properly treat it.

In fracking operations, 3 million to 5 million gallons of water are injected deep underground, along with sand and a chemical cocktail, to fracture shale rock and extract the embedded natural gas. Some of that water returns to the surface immediately after the fracturing. The rest comes back over the course of months and years. The result is that each well brings up hundreds of thousands to millions of gallons of wastewater.

Pennsylvania has invested very little in the infrastructure needed to deal with wastewater, even though the region was where the U.S. oil and gas industry got its start more than 150 years ago, Brian Lutz, a biogeochemist at Kent State University, told NBC News.

What’s more, the geology of the region limits the ability to dispose of the massive quantities of wastewater generated during fracking operations by injecting it deep underground, as is done in other regions of the country.

“That’s critical,” Lutz said, “because that means we’re generating large wastewater streams in a new geography of the country where we don’t necessarily have a pre-existing capacity and, perhaps, we don’t have the necessary physical capacity to handle these wastes that we have in other regions.”

Conventional vs. fracking

He and colleagues analyzed data from 2,189 active Marcellus Shale wells in Pennsylvania, and compared gas production and wastewater volumes to conventional well data. They found that shale gas wells typically produced 10 times the amount of wastewater as conventional wells, but they also produced about 30 times more natural gas.

Lutz noted that the study is the first to put shale gas production into the perspective of conventional production in order to benchmark the amount of wastewater being produced per unit of gas recovered from shale gas wells.

The findings make the point that “as we expand domestic natural gas production, even if the expansion were driven by conventional production, our wastewater challenge would be no less and perhaps much worse,” Lutz said.

Despite the greater efficiency in getting the gas out with fracking, however, the region has seen 570 percent growth in the amount of wastewater generated since 2004, due to the boom in natural gas production.

In 2011, the last year data were analyzed, more than 830 million gallons of wastewater were generated in Pennsylvania’s Marcellus Shale formation, Lutz and colleagues report in their study, which was published Wednesday in the journal Water Resources Research.

Natural-gas boom

Natural-gas boom
Over the past decade, the Marcellus Shale, which stretches from New York to Virginia, has gone from producing 2 percent of the nation’s natural gas output to about 10 percent. And the rush may have only just begun. Hydraulic fracturing was pioneered by the U.S. Department of Energy and its industry partners, and is largely responsible for a boom in natural gas production that some forecasts indicate will help make the country energy independent by 2035.

But independence comes at a price. As the fracking boom has accelerated, so too have concerns about the wastewater it generates and groundwater contamination from the chemicals injected into the wells.

Surprisingly, Lutz and colleagues note, only about a third of the wastewater from the Marcellus Shale wells was classified as flowback — the wastewater that comes back to the surface within a few days of a frack. The rest is brine, water that is generated in the wells over a much longer time.

“What surprised us about this, and what’s certain, is that waste was definitely being documented as being generated at the well and taken to treatment facilities two, three, four years out after the well began producing and substantial quantities of waste,” Lutz said.

Much of the controversy surrounding fracking has focused on the chemicals in the flowback, many of which are unknown to outside researchers because the drilling companies consider them proprietary. But the brine often contains a much higher pollution load than the flowback, Lutz noted. What’s more, the finding suggests that truck traffic on back roads will have to continue long after the few weeks required for the initial fracturing operation, in order to haul the wastewater off to treatment zones.

Water issues overblown?
John Krohn is a spokesman for Energy in Depth, a gas industry trade group. He said the study highlights the water efficiencies that have come with the technological advancements used to access oil and gas in shale rock formations.

Those findings, coupled with increasing water recycling rates in the natural gas industry show that wastewater issues surrounding hydraulic fracturing “are at the very least overblown and discredited, potentially, by this study,” he told NBC News.

Krohn noted that wastewater recycling rates in Pennsylvania were 70 percent in 2012, and some companies have reported rates of 100 percent. Recycling for the industry means using one of many technologies to clean the flowback and brine sufficiently to be used for subsequent fracturing operations.

“In a lot of areas, natural gas producers are able to use this fracturing fluid in excess of 20 to 25 times,” he said. “And so what that does is it lessens the water footprint of the entire industry.”

Lutz acknowledges that the industry has made strides in wastewater recycling, but he’s concerned about a future when new wells aren’t being drilled rapidly enough to handle the recycled waste.

“As soon as your well population starts to stabilize or decline, then you are left with a large volume of wastewater, and there currently is no method than can recycle that water for an alternative use — municipal or agricultural or something like that,” he said.

Krohn said he doubted that such a slowdown in well drilling would occur. If it does, other options such as injection wells will offer viable alternatives, he said.

Given the unlikelihood of a slowdown, Lutz hopes the wastewater issue stays in the discussion.

“Wastewater from the Marcellus Shale is really a central challenge to future development,” he said. “It is not an ancillary problem that is perhaps going to solve itself, but something that really needs to lead the discussion, at least from the environmental side of things, as we think about future development.”

John Roach

John Roach, Contributing Writer, NBC News

John Roach is a contributing writer for NBC News. From climate change and mass extinctions to human evolution and deep space, his writing explores life on Earth and its place in the universe. He was a staff writer at the Environmental News Network for several years and has contributed to National Geographic News for more than a decade. To learn more about him, visit his website.

Top of page


Water news archives – 600 articles-March 2012~Feb 2013: updated daily – click here -


How to navigate STW ™ postings:
Monthly posting’s calendar, become a subscriber or obtain RSS feed: see bottom index of page.
Explanation of Index:
This Months Postings: Calendar displays articles and pages posted on a given day.
Current and Archived Postings: Click on the month you want to view. Most current article for the month will appear at top of screen.
RSS Links : Obtain your RSS feeds.
Subscribe: Subscribe to postings by entering your name and e-mail address a confirmation will be sent to you.


Support Save the Water™ click here.

Supporting the water research and education programs of Save the Water™ is vital to our future generation’s health, your funding is needed today.


Save the water Education Dept  DILOS K-4 Haritika  and Save the Water Humanitarian Partnership Water Facts You May Not Know

Vol. V
509
Feb 7 2013

Water
Research

Crisis
Response

Humanitarian
Projects

Education
Daily News
DILOS Program World Water DaySave the water before its too lateMicrosope Videos A day in the life of a scientist DILOS program: youth education principles.Sponsor a program today.STEM WATER INFOGRAPHICS

Please support us by liking
our Facebook Page
Thank-You

 

Save the Water™ – STEM: water science – research – education – resource directory –updated daily.


Save the Water™
STEM Research
Material

DILOS FIELD TRIP Special Edition Banner 1

 

Water science research and education resources

Junior Resources
Felix the cat teaches junior water education Water Resource Index
Click here to go to water resource index
Fracking InfographicsClick Here to go to Fracking Infograhics
Tribal Water DirectoryClick here to go to Tribal Resource Directory
Intermediate Resources
Gif BookwormChemical FactsClick here to go to chemical facts
Microscopic ImagesClick here to go to Microscopic images
Microorganism VideosClick here to go to microscope videos
Senior Teaching Resources
Gif teacherWater FactsClick here to go to water facts
Fracking Defined Click here to go to Fracking defined
Research and Post ArchivesClick here to go to post archives


STEM water science education

Click here to go to STEM water science education
Save the Water™ is committed to the education of present and future generations to insure the protection and conservation of water. Without clean drinking water, no species plant, animal or human can be saved. We must insure that the water is not contaminated to the point where we can no longer drink it.

You will find 1,980 links to organizations that provide valuable information about water science, research, education and sanitation. This educational resource is extensive so it has been divided into categories listed below in order that you can navigate to pertinent information according to your needs. (You can click on header or image to navigate)

Whether you use these resources for research or education, we hope that you become part of the solution that will bring clean healthy water for all people regardless of their social or economic status.

DILOS™ program Click here to go to DILOS programSTEM K-8 water science videosClick here to go to STEM water science videos K-8 DILOS™ field tripClick here to go to Dilos Field TripSTEM water infographicsCLick here to go to STEM water infographics DILOS™ K-4 classroom Click here to go to DILOS CLASSROOM PRESENTATIONSTEM K-4 water music videosClick here to go to STEM water science music videos

Paypal is the safer way to transfer money
Please make your check payable to Save the Water, Inc.
and mail to:
Singer and Falk Certified Public Accountants
777 Old Country Rd
Plainview, N.Y. 11803
To Donate A Gift-In-Kind Please
Contact Us
Help make children Florida’s No. 1 priority.

Supporting water research and the education program’s growth of Save the Water™ is vital to our future generation’s health, your funding is needed.

Main Water Facts: STEM – Main site page: videos, infographics and more water facts.
Site Map: Over 400 water issue articles & resources.
STEM: Water education resources: Over 1,000 links in our education pages.
STEM: Water education: Program consists of two interesting components: Will excite children to get involved in science.
STEM: Education 40 videos: Water cycle / watershed aquifers & pollution.
STEM: Microscope videos: (Protist Kingdom) Freshwater microorganisms.
STEM: Water infographics: Water education topics illustrated: 40 combined infographics.
A day in the life of a scientist: DILOS™ program consists of a field trip to excite young minds.
DILOS™ K-4 class: K-4 class can be applied as stand alone class or preparatory for field trip.
STEM: K-8 – Water cycle songs: Water education music videos: K-8.
STEM: Junior water education resources K-4: Fun water activities and research resources for K-4.
STEM: Intermediate education resources: Intermediate water education resources 5-12.
STEM: Senior water science – water education resources: Global resources for water educators, over 200 resources.
STEM: Senior water science: Microorganisms microscope images: Freshwater Microorganisms – Protists.
STEM: Senior education fracking infographics: Fracking definition and resource infographics
STEM: Senior education fracking resources: Fracking definition and resource sites and articles.


Water news archives – 450 articles-March~January 2013: click here

 


Vol. V
Directory
Jan 7 2013

DILOS FIELD TRIP Special Edition Banner 2

 

 

 

 

Top of page

Comments Off

Fracking water contamination: Bayou frack out – The massive oil and gas disaster you’ve never heard of.

Save the Water is a U.S.-based nonprofit organization dedicated to solving the world water crisis through excellence in water science research and by forming alliances with organizations, scientists, universities, media, businesses, and governments around the world to promote awareness of water contamination issues.

Save the Water™
Daily News
Brief

A day in the life of a scientist DILOS program: youth education principles.A day in the life of a scientist  Save the Water™ youth educational principles apply water education through hands-on schooling, environmental education, stewardship teaching, and practical science literature research.
The material posted is
courtesy of
Mike Ludwig
Truthout
Save the Water™
Water Research
and is shared as
educational material only.

Save the water sponsorship
DILOS FUNDRAISING

Freshwater Microorganism images
Contaminated drinking Water

Contaminated water news

Please make your check payable to Save the Water, Inc. mail to: Singer and Falk Certified Public Accountants 777 Old Country Rd. Plainview, N.Y. 11803


 

Rating for savethewater.org


Fracking water contamination

The picturesque bayous in Assumption Parish are now contaminated with natural gas. (Photo: Jeff Dubinsky / Louisiana Environmental Action Network)

Bayou Frack Out: The massive oil and gas disaster you’ve never heard of.

Thursday, 06 December 2012 10:21 By Mike Ludwig, Truthout | Report

The picturesque bayous in Assumption Parish are now contaminated with natural gas. (Photo: Jeff Dubinsky / Louisiana Environmental Action Network)For residents in Assumption Parish, the boiling, gas-belching bayou, with its expanding toxic sinkhole and quaking earth is no longer a mystery; but there is little comfort in knowing the source of the little-known event that has forced them out of their homes.

Located about 45 miles south of Baton Rouge, Assumption Parish carries all the charms and curses of southern Louisiana. Networks of bayous, dotted with trees heavy with Spanish moss, connect with the Mississippi River as it slowly ambles toward the Gulf of Mexico. Fishermen and farmers make their homes there, and so does the oil and gas industry, which has woven its own network of wells, pipelines and processing facilities across the lowland landscape.

The first sign of the oncoming disaster was the mysterious appearance of bubbles in the bayous in the spring of 2012. For months the residents of a rural community in Assumption Parish wondered why the waters seemed to be boiling in certain spots as they navigated the bayous in their fishing boats.

Then came the earthquakes. The quakes were relatively small, but some residents reported that their houses shifted in position, and the tremors shook a community already desperate for answers. State officials launched an investigation into the earthquakes and bubbling bayous in response to public outcry, but the officials figured the bubbles were caused by a single source of natural gas, such as a pipeline leak. They were wrong.

On a summer night in early August, the earth below the Bayou Corne, located near a small residential community in Assumption, simply opened up and gave way. Several acres of swamp forest were swallowed up and replaced with a gaping sinkhole that filled itself with water, underground brines, oil and natural gas from deep below the surface. Since then, the massive sinkhole at Bayou Corne has grown to 8 acres in size.

On August 3, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal declared a statewide emergency, and local officials in Assumption ordered the mandatory evacuation of about 300 residents of more than 150 homes located about a half-mile from the sinkhole. Four months later, officials continue to tell residents that they do not know when they will be able to return home. A few have chosen to ignore the order and have stayed in their homes, but the neighborhood is now quiet and nearly vacant. Across the road from the residential community, a parking lot near a small boat launch ramp has been converted to a command post for state police and emergency responders.

“This place is no longer fit for human habitation, and will forever be,” shouted one frustrated evacuee at a recent community meeting in Assumption.

The Bayou Corne sinkhole is an unprecedented environmental disaster. Geologists say they have never dealt with anything quite like it before, but the sinkhole has made few headlines beyond the local media. No news may be good news for Texas Brine, a Houston-based drilling and storage firm that for years milked an underground salt cavern on the edge of large salt formation deep below the sinkhole area. From oil and gas drilling, to making chloride and other chemicals needed for plastics and chemical processing, the salty brine produced by such wells is the lifeblood of the petrochemical industry.

Geologists and state officials now believe that Texas Brine’s production cavern below Bayou Corne collapsed from the side and filled with rock, oil and gas from deposits around the salt formation. The pressure in the cavern was too great and caused a “frack out.” Like Mother Nature’s own version of the controversial oil and gas drilling technique known as “fracking,” brine and other liquids were forced vertically out of the salt cavern, fracturing rock toward the surface and causing the ground to give way.

“In the oil field, you’ve heard of hydraulic fracturing; that’s what they’re using to develop gas and oil wells around the country …”What is a frack-out is, is when you get the pressure too high and instead fracturing where you want, it fractures all the way to the surface,” said Gary Hecox, a geologist with the Shaw Environmental Group, at a recent community meeting in Assumption Parish. Texas Brine brought in the Shaw group to help mitigate the sinkhole.

As the weeks went by, officials determined the unstable salt cavern was to blame for the mysterious tremors and bubbling bayous. Texas Brine publically claimed the failure of the cavern was caused by seismic activity and refused to take responsibility for the sinkhole, but the United States Geological Survey (USGS) has since determined that the collapsing cavern caused the tremors felt in the neighborhood, not the other way around.

According to Hecox and the USGS, the collapsing cavern shifted and weakened underground rock formations, causing the earthquakes and allowing natural gas and oil to migrate upward and contaminate the local groundwater aquifer. Gas continues to force its way up, and now a layer of gas sits on top of the aquifer and leaches through the ground into the bayous, causing the water to bubble up in several spots. Gas moves much faster through water than oil, which explains why the bubbles have not been accompanied by a familiar sheen.

Documents obtained by the Baton Rouge newspaper, The Advocate, revealed that in 2011, Texas Brine sent a letter to the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to alert its director, Joseph Ball, that the cavern had failed a “mechanical integrity test” and would be capped and shut down. The DNR received the letter but did not require any additional monitoring of the well’s integrity.

Despite this letter, regulators apparently did not suspect the brine cavern to be the source of the bubbles until a few days before the sinkhole appeared, The Advocate reported. The letter raised ire among local officials, who did not hear about the failed integrity test until after Bayou Corne became a slurry pit.

Texas Brine spokesmen Sonny Cranch told Truthout the company has not officially taken responsibility for the sinkhole disaster, but has “acknowledged that there is a relationship” between the collapsed cavern and the sinkhole.

A historic disaster

“It’s a tough problem. Nobody in the world has ever faced a situation like this that we’re grappling with,” Hecox told evacuees at a community meeting on November 13.

At an earlier public meeting on October 23, Hecox said there is no “cookbook” for dealing with the sinkhole and, because the disaster is unprecedented, there is no clear path for a cleanup. After all, he said, you can’t “fix” a collapsed underground cavern.

At the most recent meeting, Hecox told residents that installing methane monitors in houses near the sinkhole was one step that must to be taken if they ever wish to return home. At one point, an evacuee interrupted Hecox.

“You expect us to go back to our houses again?” the evacuee shouted from the audience. “Have y’all lost your damn minds?”

No place like home

Nick Romero is a former postal worker from Baton Rouge who moved to the Belle Rose community in Assumption parish to retire next to the bayous.

“Until May 30, or whenever they reported the bubbles and stuff, everything was great around here, just great,” Romero told Truthout during an interview at his home near the sinkhole in early November.

Romero has a small boathouse on the bayou behind his home, where he and his wife have lived for more than 15 years. Romero can simply push a button to drop his boat in the water and follow the bayou to his favorite fishing holes.

“The fishing was great, ah man,” Romero said. “I just go over there, turn a nob, and if they don’t bite, I go back to doing what I’m doing.”

But Romero has not gone fishing anywhere in the neighborhood since the sinkhole opened up nearby.

“You just don’t know what could happen next,” he said.

Every night before going to sleep, Romero surfs the web for updates on the sinkhole from various local and state agencies. Sometimes he wakes up in the middle of the night, worried about the sinkhole, and spends hours thinking about questions to ask authorities, or looking up information online.

Romero said he sometimes smells the sinkhole, which sits behind a tree line on the other side of a nearby state road. The morning before the interview, he said, was the first time the fumes came into his house. The air outside was heavy and thick, and soon the smell was inside, hanging low about the house. Luckily, he said, as the day heated up, the fumes evaporated.

Romero probably smelled the stench of the crude oil floating on the top of the sinkhole. Texas Brine has been skimming it from the surface and pumping what they can out of the ground.

Romero and his wife among the last people still living in their homes on their block in early November.The rest had evacuated. Romero said they had finally decided to move out just a few days earlier, but they did not know where to go. Should they sign a lease on a new home? What if returning home became possible in a few months? Hecox and local authorities have made it clear that they have no idea when the evacuation order will be lifted. For the Romeros, there are too many questions and not enough answers.

Romero’s decision to finally evacuate was partially based on serious health concerns: His wife is battling breast cancer for the second time in a decade. He gestured with his hand, naming nearby homes where residents had also developed breast cancer. From 2005 to 2009, Assumption Parish had the seventh highest breast cancer rate among Louisiana’s 64 counties, according to the National Cancer Institute. Romero is concerned about radioactive material that was produced by Texas Brine’s mining operation more than a decade ago.

In 1995, Texas Brine asked state authorities for permission to dump “low amounts” of soils containing underground radioactive material into the cavern that is now collapsed. The “naturally occurring radioactive material,” also known as NORM, had accumulated in soils near the well pad as part of the brine production process.

Texas Brine’s Cranch said there was a “serious discussion” about storing the NORM in the cavern, but that never happened. Instead, he said, the company left the material near the wellhead and above ground, as allowed by state law. Cranch said NORM has a “low level” of radiation and a “low half-life.”

“This stuff is everyday stuff,” Cranch said.

State officials found NORM in the sinkhole in August, but only at concentrations well below even acceptable levels. They determined it did not pose a risk to human health, and there’s no hard evidence linking the radioactive material to the cases of breast cancer noted by Romero. The NORM is simply another unknown on Romero’s list of worries.

“It was a nice, laidback, easygoing place,” Romero said of his community. “You feel safe. But you just don’t have that anymore.”

No end in sight

On November 27, the sinkhole had a “burp,” according to observers. Crude oil and woody debris rose to the surface, as water from a nearby swamp was seen flowing into the sinkhole. The “burp” roughly coincided with seismic activity recorded by the US Geological Survey.

The sinkhole continues to shift and settle, as do the fractured rocks below it, regularly causing tremors and micro-earthquakes observed by seismic monitors. Shaw Geologist Gary Hecox believes the sinkhole may increase in diameter, and observers have found that the depth of the sinkhole has decreased from 490 feet to 140 feet.

At a public meeting in mid-October, Hecox told evacuees that there is a considerable amount of subterranean material that has yet to be accounted for and may continue the frack out. At the time, the sinkhole measured 550 feet across, but Hecox calculated that it could grow to 1,500 feet across. When asked how many trees and living things could be killed by brine and oil leaking from the sinkhole, Hecox said he did not know.

The hole won’t grow big enough to swallow the nearby neighborhood or state highway, Hecox said, but he continued to insist that the mandatory evacuation order is appropriate. When asked about the risks faced by those who ignored the order, which is “mandatory” but not enforced, Hecox repeatedly said that he would “not let his grandkids” live near the sinkhole.

Cleanup work continues while residents wait for the undetermined end of the evacuation order. Some evacuees are staying with friends and family; others are renting places to stay while they wait.

Texas Brine has recovered a considerable amount of oil from the sinkhole and formations below, but the company has failed to keep oil and other pollutants from contaminating nearby waterways, according to state officials. On December 1, Louisiana Commissioner of Conservation James Welsh fined Texas Brine $100,000 for failing to meet several deadlines for the cleanup effort. The company failed to install a containment system at the sinkhole to prevent contamination of nearby waterways by a November 16 deadline, Welsh said. Texas Brine also failed to meet deadlines for installing methane monitors in nearby homes and establishing a number of vent wells to burn off natural gas in the aquifer and other underground formations.

“We cannot, and will not, tolerate delays or excuses in the effort to protect public safety and the environment, especially when the people of Bayou Corne still cannot feel comfortable returning to their own homes,” Welsh said.

The company is also under state to orders to pay a weekly $875 stipend to each evacuated household.

Vent wells set up by Texas Brine are now burning off the natural gas that contaminated local aquifer. Like flaming torches, pipes connected to the aquifer let flames fly into the open air as the gas makes its way out of the groundwater. One vent well removing gas from the aquifer can burn about 46,900 cubic feet of gas per day.

Wilma Subra, a chemist and technical advisor for the Louisiana Environmental Action Network, has been monitoring the sinkhole and evacuated neighborhood. Subra, who has documented environmental justice issues across the country, told Truthout that the evacuees and others living nearby are “a very well-informed and engaged community.”

Public meetings and web postings provided by local officials, Texas Brine and state regulators provide the community with updated information on a near-daily basis. A spokesperson for Texas Brine told Truthout the company is trying to make its operations as transparent as possible.

Transparency alone, however, will not bring the evacuees back to their homes.

“We are doing all we can do…. Mother Nature has to take its course,” said spokesperson Cranch, who added that Texas Brine did not issue the evacuation order and some people have ignored it and returned home.

Romero and other residents remain frustrated with Texas Brine. They say that simply complying with state orders to clean up the sinkhole is not enough, and the company should go above and beyond the call of duty to return them to their homes.

“They are frustrated and they are scared, and the level of frustration and the level of depression are building,” Subra said. “They have been out of their homes since the beginning of August, and there is basically no end in sight.”

The Bayou Corne sinkhole is not going away anytime soon. Texas Brine, state authorities and experts like Hecox have made it clear there is no magic fix for a massive slurry pit, a collapsed underground cavern and untold amounts of oil and gas escaping through the disturbed earth.

These are difficult facts to face for residents like Romero. Even if they can return to their homes one day, he said, the neighborhood will never be the same.

Copyright, Truthout. May not be reprinted without permission of the author.


To see more photos and original article please Click here
Top of page
 


New: STEM water science resource material.

Main Water Facts: STEM – Main site page: videos, infographics and more water facts.
Site Map: Over 400 water issue articles & resources.
STEM: Water education resources: Over 1,000 links in our education pages.
STEM: Water education: Program consists of two interesting components: Will excite children to get involved in science.
STEM: Education 40 videos: Water cycle / watershed / aquifers & pollution.
STEM: Microscope videos: (Protist Kingdom) Freshwater microorganisms.
A day in the life of a scientist: DILOS™ program consists of a field trip to excite young minds.
DILOS™ K-4 class: K-4 class can be applied as stand alone class or preparatory for field trip.

STEM: K-8 – Water cycle songs: Water education music videos: K-8.
STEM: Junior water education resources K-4: Fun water activities and research resources for K-4.
STEM: Intermediate education resources: Intermediate water education resources 5-12.
STEM: Senior water science – water education resources: Global resources for water educators, over 200 resources.
STEM: Senior water science: Microorganisms microscope images: Freshwater Microorganisms – Protists.
STEM: Senior education fracking infographics: Fracking definition and resource infographics
STEM: Senior education fracking resources: Fracking definition and resource sites and articles.


Water news archives-375 articles-March~November 2012: click here

How to navigate STW ™ postings:
Monthly posting’s calendar, become a subscriber or obtain RSS feed: see bottom index of page.
Explanation of Index:
This Months Postings: Calendar displays articles and pages posted on a given day.
Current and Archived Postings: Click on the month you want to view. Most current article for the month will appear at top of screen.
RSS Links : Obtain your RSS feeds.
Subscribe: Subscribe to postings by entering your name and e-mail address a confirmation will be sent to you.


Support Save the Water™ click here.


Supporting the water research and education programs of Save the Water™ is vital to our future generation’s health, your funding is needed.

Save the water Education Dept  DILOS K-4 Haritika  and Save the Water Humanitarian Partnership Water Facts You May Not Know

Vol. IV
401
Dec 7 2012

A day in the life of a scientist DILOS program: youth education principles.Sponsor a program today.
Water
Research

Crisis
Response

Humanitarian
Projects

Education
Daily News

The DILOS program launches in full this November with both the Girl Scouts and Boy Scouts of America entering into a joint partnership agreement with STW™. Local and national media coverage will follow the first field trip. Over 200 online newspapers worldwide as far as Australia, including the New York Times will receive press releases. Subsequent fieldtrips will be documented with photos and videos, with permission, for the STW™ website and press releases. The names of school, participants, and sponsors will be displayed on the STW™ website.
Save the water before its too late

Freshwater microorganisms Videos
Categories

Archived Posts
Drinking Water News
Fluoride
Fracking
Ground Water News
Misc Water Issues
Petroleum and Fracking
Questions and Answers
Water & Your Health
Water Contamination

Top Postings

Current Water News

Major advance in using sunlight to produce steam without boiling water.

Report – Cleanup of some contaminated groundwater sites unlikely for decades.

Andhra Pradesh – Catholic nuns bring drinking water-250 tribal families.

Costco opponents in Yorktown hail report citing water-contamination risk.

Infographic – Is the world looming on a water crisis?

Canada – Montreal – Water and our society – On Montreal’s crumbling water systems.

Canada – Huron County – Flood of concern over nuclear dump.

Please support us by liking
our Facebook Page
Thank-You

1 Comment

Fracking – Injection wells – The hidden risks of pumping waste underground – Polluted water fuels a battle for answers.

 Fracking Injection wells  The hidden risks of pumping waste underground  Polluted water Drinking water contamination news. Save the water  Volume 3


Fracking Injection wells  The hidden risks of pumping waste underground  Polluted water Drinking water contamination news. Save the water

News Posting
Vol.III
No.183
July 12
2012

 Fracking Injection wells  The hidden risks of pumping waste underground  Polluted water Drinking water contamination news. Save the water ,  Drinking water contamination news

 

Despite many successful water projects, billions of people still lack adequate water and sanitation
 
Save the Water™ does not represent nor endorse the postings herein or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other information furnished by the author.

For your surfing
pleasure here
are some links in our revamped web site

Educational All Levels
Current Sponsors
Resources
Join Our Link Exchange 

Help fund STW™ laboratory by shopping on line at our storeProceeds go to funding our Lab
Become A Sponsor

To Donate A Gift
Please Contact Us


The material posted is
courtesy of
Abrahm Lustgarten
ProPublica
Save the Water™
Water Research
Education Dept.
and is shared as
educational material only

Save the Water™

1st Annual
Internet
Sponsorship
Fundraiser
Campaign
June 1st
September 1st
2012

 Horizontal drilling, hydraulic fracturing, and shale gas have received a ton of press lately, Drinking water contamination news


Water
Research
Crisis
Response
Humanitarian
Projects
Education
Daily News


Contaminated drinking Water

A Homeowner's Guide to Septic Systems A Homeowner’s Guide to Septic Systems:
free brochure



 
Rating for savethewater.org

Fracking-injection wells-Polluted water fuels a battle for answers.

by Abrahm Lustgarten ProPublica, June 21, 2012, 10:01 a.m.

Republish Connect with Facebook to share articles you read on ProPublica. Learn more »

For the better part of a decade, Rev. David Hudson has been fighting to uncover what’s polluting the water in his home town.

Hudson moved to DeBerry, Texas, a poor, predominantly black community straddling the Louisiana border in 2002.

DeBerry lies in the heart of the Haynesville Shale natural gas development. When Hudson moved in, the area was littered with injection wells used to deposit waste from oil and gas drilling deep beneath the earth.

The well sites – often located just a few yards from residents’ doorsteps – were busy industrial zones clogged with truck traffic and holding tanks. Oil stains spattered the ground around pipes where waste was pumped underground.

Hudson said he soon noticed that his well water had a metallic flavor and a sharp smell. Congregants in his church told him theirs was cloudy and salty to taste, leaving rings in toilets and sinks. They said they had been complaining to Texas officials since 1996, yet no one had investigated.

“Our cries, they just fall on deaf ears,” Hudson said.

Shortly after moving to DeBerry, Hudson sent water from his well and four of his neighbors’ to be tested for pollutants. The results showed high levels of chlorides, chemicals found in drilling waste, a federal report said.

According to the report, Hudson shared the tests with Basic Energy Services, the company that operated the waste wells nearby, which sent them to the Railroad Commission of Texas, the agency that regulates disposal wells for oil and gas drilling waste.

Nearly a year after receiving the material, commission officials tested DeBerry’s water themselves, confirming that it contained arsenic, cadmium, lead, benzene and other substances. The contamination was extensive enough that they advised DeBerry residents not to drink their water, leaving Hudson and others to purchase bottled water.

In 2004, Texas officials ordered the injection wells in DeBerry to be permanently shut down. A series of 30-foot monitoring wells were drilled to test for leaking waste around the area, and one deeper well was drilled to take samples from 170 feet below. None of the data collected enabled the Railroad Commission to determine the cause of the pollution, however.

To Hudson and others, there were powerful clues in the commission’s own records, which showed that one of the injection wells had a history of problems. In 2000, a Louisiana trucking company illegally dumped thousands of gallons of hazardous waste from an oil refinery into it, material far more dangerous than the well was allowed to accept under government regulations. Five years later, a mechanical integrity test detected a crack in the well structure that allowed waste to leak.

“Produced water was observed flowing from between the surface casing and the production casing,” a Railroad Commission official wrote to Basic Energy Services in Feb. 2006. “RRC staff requests that Basic immediately evaluate the need for further environmental investigation of groundwater.”

Still, federal and state regulators struggled to obtain a definitive answer about what caused the pollution.

According to a 2007 report by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s inspector general, the Railroad Commission had a difficult time getting Basic Energy to cooperate. The agency ordered the company to drill additional deep disposal wells to monitor DeBerry’s water, but the company refused.

“Basic Energy Services informed the State that it did not believe the contamination was its responsibility, and since the freshwater well had been plugged, deeper groundwater testing could not be conducted,” the inspector general’s report said.

Basic Energy Services did not return a call requesting comment.

The Railroad Commission told ProPublica that it had done everything it could to solve the mystery.

“The commission investigation did not identify a large plume of hydrocarbon and saltwater in the groundwater that connected the former… facility to residents’ water wells,” said Ramona Nye, a spokeswoman for the agency. “Commission staff address all water well complaints promptly and base their decisions on science and fact.”

Unsatisfied with the state’s progress, federal EPA officials took over the investigation in 2005 under the Superfund program, ordering more water sampling around the injection wells. For the first time, a decade after the saga began, the EPA also began supplying bottled water to DeBerry residents.

By 2007, however, the EPA also concluded that injection wells played no part in DeBerry’s water contamination.

“A range of surface activities including septic systems, surface spills and/or agricultural and domestic practices caused the ground water contamination,” an EPA spokesperson told ProPublica in an April, 2012 email. “Comprehensive review of the admin record for the injection wells in question indicated no ground water contamination from the wells.”

The EPA declined to allow any of its staff in Texas to be interviewed for this story, sending written responses to several questions.

The 2007 inspector general report suggested the EPA’s conclusion may have been premature, however.

“Region 6 personnel told us they believe evidence shows the contamination did not originate from the injection well,” the inspector general’s report states. “Neither the State nor EPA has conclusively determined the source of the contamination… The full extent of the contamination, its lateral limits, its depth, and its migration patterns or movement along the groundwater plume is not known.”

Earlier this month, EPA officials returned to DeBerry to sample five public drinking water wells, in “response to community concerns,” according to a statement sent to ProPublica by the agency Wednesday. The agency did not respond to questions about whether it was reconsidering its previous conclusions.

Hudson has little hope that the renewed scrutiny will yield closure.

“We will always have a problem proving the contaminants are coming from injection wells. You’d have to have a camera underneath the ground somewhere,” Hudson said. “Even if they find oil and gas carcinogens in the water, they are going to find another way to say it came from somewhere else. Nobody wants to say what the cause was.”

Facts: Ten scariest chemicals used in hydraulic fracking

 The following is courtousy of Michael Kelley | Mar. 16, 2012, 1:35 PM

Methanol

MethanolFlickr/prizepony
Methanol appeared most often in hydraulic fracturing products (in terms of the number of compounds containing the chemical).
Found in antifreeze, paint solvent and vehicle fuel.
Vapors can cause eye irritation, headache and fatigue, and in high enough doses can be fatal. Swallowing may cause eye damage or death.
 
 

BTEX compounds

BTEX compoundsFlcikr/arimoore
The BTEX compounds – benzene, toluene, xylene, and ethylbenzene – are listed as hazardous air pollutants in the Clean Air Act and contaminents in the Safe Drinking Water Act.
Benzene, commonly found in gasoline, is also a known human carcinogen. Long time exposure can cause cancer, bone marrow failure, or leukemia. Short term effects include dizziness, weakness, headache, breathlessness, chest constriction, nausea, and vomiting. Toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes have harmful effects on the central nervous system. The hydraulic fracturing companies injected 11.4 million gallons of products containing at least one BTEX chemical between 2005 and 2009.

Diesel fuel

Diesel fuelA carcinogen listed as a hazardous air pollutant under the Clean Air Act and a contaminant in the Safe Drinking Water Act.
In its 2004 report, the EPA stated that the “use of diesel fuel in fracturing fluids poses the greatest threat” to underground sources of drinking water.
Hydraulic fracturing companies injected more than 30 million gallons of diesel fuel or hydraulic fracturing fluids containing diesel fuel in wells in 19 states.
Diesel fuel contains toxic constituents, including BTEX compounds. Contact with skin may cause redness, itching, burning, severe skin damage and cancer. (Kerosene is also used. Found in jet and rocket fuel, the vapor can cause irritation of the eyes and nose, and ingestion can be fatal. Chronic exposure may cause drowsiness, convulsions, coma or death.)

Lead

LeadFlickr/matthileo
A carcinogen found in paint, building construction materials and roofing joints.
It is listed as a hazardous air pollutant in the Clean Air Act and a contaminant in the Safe Drinking Water Act.
Lead is particularly harmful to children’s neurological development. It also can cause reproductive problems, high blood pressure, and nerve disorders in adults.
One of the hydraulic fracturing companies used 780 gallons of a product containing lead between 2005 and 2009.

Hydrogen fluoride

Hydrogen fluorideFlickr/Molly Des Jardin
Found in rust removers, aluminum brighteners and heavy duty cleaners.
Listed as a hazardous air pollutant in the Clean Air Act.
Fumes are highly irritating, corrosive, and poisonous. Repeated ingestion over time can lead to hardening of the bones, and contact with liquid can produce severe burns. A lethal dose is 1.5 grams.
Absorption of substantial amounts of hydrogen fluoride by any route may be fatal.
One of the hydraulic fracturing companies used 67,222 gallons of two products containing hydrogen fluoride in 2008 and 2009.

Naphthalene

NaphthaleneFlickr/CraftyGoat
A carcinogen found in mothballs.
Listed as a hazardous air pollutant in the Clean Air Act.
Inhalation can cause respiratory tract irritation, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, fever or death.
 
 
 

Sulfuric acid

Sulfuric acidFlickr/yetanotherdave
A carcinogen found in lead-acid batteries for cars.
Corrosive to all body tissues. Inhalation may cause serious lung damage and contact with eyes can lead to a total loss of vision. The lethal dose is between 1 teaspoonful and one-half ounce.
 
 
 

Crystalline silica

Crystalline silicaSource: ProPublica
A carcinogen found in concrete, brick mortar and construction sands.
Dust is harmful if inhaled repeatedly over a long period of time and can lead to silicosis or cancer.
 
 
 
 

Formaldehyde

FormaldehydeFlickr/Stadtkatze
A carcinogen found in embalming agents for human or animal remains.
Ingestion of even one ounce of liquid can cause death. Exposure over a long period of time can cause lung damage and reproductive problems in women.
 
 
 

Unknown chemicals

Unknown chemicalsFlickr/SoulRider.222
“Many of the hydraulic fracturing fluids contain chemical components that are listed as ‘proprietary’ or ‘trade secret.’ The companies used 94 million gallons of 279 products that contained at least one chemical or component that the manufacturers deemed proprietary or a trade secret. In many instances, the oil and gas service companies were unable to identify these ‘proprietary’ chemicals,suggesting that the companies are injecting fluids containing chemicals that they themselves cannot identify.”

 

  • How to navigate STW ™ postings:
    View monthly posting’s calendar, become a subscriber or obtain RSS feed by going to the bottom index of this page.
  • Explanation of Index:
  • This Months Postings: Calendar on left displays articles and pages posted on a given day.
  • Current and Archived Postings: Click on the month you want to view. Most current article for the month will appear at top of screen.
  • RSS Links : Obtain your RSS feeds.
  • Subscribe: Subscribe to postings by entering your e-mail address and confirming your e-mail.
  • Supporting water research and the education program’s growth of Save the Water™ is vital to our future generation’s health, your funding is needed.

    Rating for savethewater.org


    Fracking
  • Within 100 years: Our underground drinking water could be filled with toxic waste
  • Fracking mines spread quickly in U.S. / Fracking by country data included
  • Michigan, Ohio should strengthen laws on fracking, says new NWF report
  • Methane migration probed in Tioga County
  • What are the ten scariest chemicals used in fracking?
  • The Frick and Frac about hydraulic fracturing
  • Toxipedia: Hydraulic fracturing update
  • Drinking Water Contamination
  • Camp Lejeune news: Effects of drinking water contamination due to tetrachloroethylene.
  • Drinking water contamination: Tap water disinfectants linked to birth defects.
  • Camp Lejeune toxic water investigation. The families and protectors of the United States health in jeopardy .
  • High Arsenic in 1 in 5 New Hampshire Wells
  • Toxic garden hose water: Drinking from common water hoses potentially dangerous
  • India,West Mambalam: Overflowing sewage remains a perennial problem
  • Alberta Canada: 3,000 barrels of oil spilled from pipeline. Water OK after Canadian oil spill
  • Pesticides detected upstream of reservoir feeding Australia, Melbourne’s drinking water supply
  • Good News
  • Mayors make ‘Declaration on Water Sustainability’ to protect Great Lakes and St. Lawrence
  • Bio filters from tree fungi. Students research synthetic variant enzymes that can break down estrogen
  • Education Program
  • What are the facts about chloramines
  • Wastewater and antibiotic resistance
  • Sustainable denim manufacturing process creates ‘green’ jeans
  • India water crisis news: Delhi’s Lutyens’ zone reels under severe water crisis
  • Groundwater & aquifers, what they are and why they must be protected.
  • What are some bottle water facts? [Illustrated ]
  • Illustrated water cycle: Marine debris bulletin: Identifying high pressure “gas cylinders from Japan debris”
  • Archived Topics
  • Drinking Water Fears After Chemical Spill In North Bay
  • North Bay Ontario/Residents Evacuated, Driver Dead, In Contamination Rollover On Highway 63
  • Canadian B.C. Water Crisis Issues
  • Jamaica: No need to panic! Asbestos cement pipes safe, says NWC
  • Should We Hide Low-Dose Radiation Exposures From The Public?
  • Formaldehyde Pollution Disrupts Water Supplies in Eastern Japan
  • Chemicals In The Water: Problems and Solutions
  • What Is Hydraulic Fracturing Water Usage?
  • Savethewater Water Research and Education

    Comments Off

    Water contamination news: Within 100 years: Our underground drinking water could be filled with toxic waste. [Abrahm Lustgarten, ProPublica, Businessinsider.com]

    Save the water News Postings Save our water  Volume 3

    current post

    News Posting
    Vol.III
    No.170

    June 30th 2012

    /> , U.S. industries have injected more than 30 trillion gallons of toxic liquid deep into the earth ” width=”100″ height=”129″ /></a></p>
<p></center> </p>
<p><center>Despite many successful water projects, billions of people still lack adequate water and sanitation</center><center><br />  <br />
Save the Water™ does not represent or endorse the postings herein or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other information furnished by the author.<br />
<br /><a href=


    For your surfing
    pleasure here
    are some links in our revamped web site

    Educational All Levels
    Current Sponsors
    Resources
    Join Our Link Exchange 

    Help fund STW™ laboratory by shopping on line at our storeProceeds go to funding our Lab
    Become A Sponsor

    To Donate A Gift
    Please Contact Us


    The material posted is
    courtesy of:
    Abrahm Lustgarten
    Businessinsider.com
    ProPublica
    Save the Water™
    Water Research
    Education Dept.
    and is shared as
    educational material only

    Save the Water™

    1st Annual
    Internet
    Sponsorship
    Fundraiser
    Campaign
    June 1st
    September 1st
    2012

     , U.S. industries have injected more than 30 trillion gallons of toxic liquid deep into the earth<br />
 ” title=”Save the Water Fundraiser ” width=”135″ height=”231″ class=”aligncenter size-full wp-image-10776″ /></a></p>
<p></center><center><br />
<strong> <a title= Water
    Research
    Crisis
    Response
    Humanitarian
    Projects
    Education
    Daily News



    Contaminated Water Animation

    A Homeowner's Guide to Septic Systems A Homeowner’s Guide to Septic Systems:
    free brochure

    [PDF Format]– This 15-page booklet describes how a septic system works and what a homeowner can do to help the system treat their wastewater efficiently.


    Stock Save the water New Study Predicts Fracking Fluids Will Seep Into Aquifers Within Years

    Within 100 Years, Our Underground Drinking Water Could Be Filled With Toxic Waste

    Abrahm Lustgarten

    Abrahm Lustgarten, ProPublica | Jun. 26, 2012, 1:21 PM
    Over the past several decades, U.S. industries have injected more than 30 trillion gallons of toxic liquid deep into the earth, using broad expanses of the nation’s geology as an invisible dumping ground.

    No company would be allowed to pour such dangerous chemicals into the rivers or onto the soil. But until recently, scientists and environmental officials have assumed that deep layers of rock beneath the earth would safely entomb the waste for millennia.

    There are growing signs they were mistaken.

    Records from disparate corners of the United States show that wells drilled to bury this waste deep beneath the ground have repeatedly leaked, sending dangerous chemicals and waste gurgling to the surface or, on occasion, seeping into shallow aquifers that store a significant portion of the nation’s drinking water.

    In 2010, contaminants from such a well bubbled up in a west Los Angeles dog park. Within the past three years, similar fountains of oil and gas drilling waste have appeared in Oklahoma and Louisiana. In South Florida, 20 of the nation’s most stringently regulated disposal wells failed in the early 1990s, releasing partly treated sewage into aquifers that may one day be needed to supply Miami’s drinking water.

    There are more than 680,000 underground waste and injection wells nationwide, more than 150,000 of which shoot industrial fluids thousands of feet below the surface. Scientists and federal regulators acknowledge they do not know how many of the sites are leaking.

    Federal officials and many geologists insist that the risks posed by all this dumping are minimal. Accidents are uncommon, they say, and groundwater reserves—from which most Americans get their drinking water—remain safe and far exceed any plausible threat posed by injecting toxic chemicals into the ground.

    But in interviews, several key experts acknowledged that the idea that injection is safe rests on science that has not kept pace with reality, and on oversight that doesn’t always work.

    “In 10 to 100 years we are going to find out that most of our groundwater is polluted,” said Mario Salazar, an engineer who worked for 25 years as a technical expert with the EPA’s underground injection program in Washington. “A lot of people are going to get sick, and a lot of people may die.”

    The boom in oil and natural gas drilling is deepening the uncertainties, geologists acknowledge. Drilling produces copious amounts of waste, burdening regulators and demanding hundreds of additional disposal wells. Those wells—more holes punched in the ground—are changing the earth’s geology, adding man-made fractures that allow water and waste to flow more freely.

    “There is no certainty at all in any of this, and whoever tells you the opposite is not telling you the truth,” said Stefan Finsterle, a leading hydrogeologist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory who specializes in understanding the properties of rock layers and modeling how fluid flows through them. “You have changed the system with pressure and temperature and fracturing, so you don’t know how it will behave.”

    A ProPublica review of well records, case histories and government summaries of more than 220,000 well inspections found that structural failures inside injection wells are routine. From late 2007 to late 2010, one well integrity violation was issued for every six deep injection wells examined—more than 17,000 violations nationally. More than 7,000 wells showed signs that their walls were leaking. Records also show wells are frequently operated in violation of safety regulations and under conditions that greatly increase the risk of fluid leakage and the threat of water contamination.

    Structurally, a disposal well is the same as an oil or gas well. Tubes of concrete and steel extend anywhere from a few hundred feet to two miles into the earth. At the bottom, the well opens into a natural rock formation. There is no container. Waste simply seeps out, filling tiny spaces left between the grains in the rock like the gaps between stacked marbles.

    Many scientists and regulators say the alternatives to the injection process—burning waste, treating wastewater, recycling, or disposing of waste on the surface—are far more expensive or bring additional environmental risks.

    Subterranean waste disposal, they point out, is a cornerstone of the nation’s economy, relied on by the pharmaceutical, agricultural and chemical industries. It’s also critical to a future less dependent on foreign oil: Hydraulic fracturing, “clean coal” technologies, nuclear fuel production and carbon storage (the keystone of the strategy to address climate change) all count on pushing waste into rock formations below the earth’s surface.

    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, which has primary regulatory authority over the nation’s injection wells, would not discuss specific well failures identified by ProPublica or make staffers available for interviews. The agency also declined to answer many questions in writing, though it sent responses to several. Its director for the Drinking Water Protection Division, Ann Codrington, sent a statement to ProPublica defending the injection program’s effectiveness.

    “Underground injection has been and continues to be a viable technique for subsurface storage and disposal of fluids when properly done,” the statement said. “EPA recognizes that more can be done to enhance drinking water safeguards and, along with states and tribes, will work to improve the efficiency of the underground injection control program.”

    Still, some experts see the well failures and leaks discovered so far as signs of broader problems, raising concerns about how much pollution may be leaking out undetected. By the time the damage is discovered, they say, it could be irreversible.

    “Are we heading down a path we might regret in the future?” said Anthony Ingraffea, a Cornell University engineering professor who has been an outspoken critic of claims that wells don’t leak. “Yes.”

    Read the rest of Abrahm’s article: click>>

    Other Articles by Abrahm Lustgarten: click >>:

    Read more about Abrahm Lustgarten at the end of this article.

    New Study Predicts Fracking Fluids Will Seep Into Aquifers Within Years

    Abrahm Lustgarten, ProPublica | May 3, 2012, 12:38 PM |

    A new study has raised fresh concerns about the safety of gas drilling in the Marcellus Shale, concluding that fracking chemicals injected into the ground could migrate toward drinking water supplies far more quickly than experts have previously predicted.

    More than 5,000 wells were drilled in the Marcellus between mid-2009 and mid-2010, according to the study, which was published in the journal Ground Water two weeks ago. Operators inject up to 4 million gallons of fluid, under more than 10,000 pounds of pressure, to drill and frack each well.

    Scientists have theorized that impermeable layers of rock would keep the fluid, which contains benzene and other dangerous chemicals, safely locked nearly a mile below water supplies. This view of the earth’s underground geology is a cornerstone of the industry’s argument that fracking poses minimal threats to the environment.

    But the study, using computer modeling, concluded that natural faults and fractures in the Marcellus, exacerbated by the effects of fracking itself, could allow chemicals to reach the surface in as little as “just a few years.”

    “Simply put, [the rock layers] are not impermeable,” said the study’s author, Tom Myers, an independent hydrogeologist whose clients include the federal government and environmental groups.

    “The Marcellus shale is being fracked into a very high permeability,” he said. “Fluids could move from most any injection process.”

    The research for the study was paid for by Catskill Mountainkeeper and the Park Foundation, two upstate New York organizations that have opposed gas drilling and fracking in the Marcellus.

    Much of the debate about the environmental risks of gas drilling has centered on the risk that spills could pollute surface water or that structural failures would cause wells to leak.

    Though some scientists believed it was possible for fracking to contaminate underground water supplies, those risks have been considered secondary. The study in Ground Water is the first peer-reviewed research evaluating this possibility.

    The study did not use sampling or case histories to assess contamination risks. Rather, it used software and computer modeling to predict how fracking fluids would move over time. The simulations sought to account for the natural fractures and faults in the underground rock formations and the effects of fracking.

    The models predict that fracking will dramatically speed up the movement of chemicals injected into the ground. Fluids traveled distances within 100 years that would take tens of thousands of years under natural conditions. And when the models factored in the Marcellus’ natural faults and fractures, fluids could move 10 times as fast as that.

    Where man-made fractures intersect with natural faults, or break out of the Marcellus layer into the stone layer above it, the study found, “contaminants could reach the surface areas in tens of years, or less.”

    The study also concluded that the force that fracking exerts does not immediately let up when the process ends. It can take nearly a year to ease.

    As a result, chemicals left underground are still being pushed away from the drill site long after drilling is finished. It can take five or six years before the natural balance of pressure in the underground system is fully restored, the study found.Read the rest of Abrahm’s article: click>>

    This story was originally published by Abrahm Lustgarten ProPublica.

    Abrahm Lustgarten

    Abrahm Lustgarten writes about energy, water, climate change and anything else having to do with the environment. Abrahm earned his master’s in journalism from Columbia University in 2003 and is the author of Run to Failure: BP and the Making of the Deepwater Horizon Disaster, and also China’s Great Train: Beijing’s Drive West and the Campaign to Remake Tibet, a project that was funded in part by a grant from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.

    Excellent Article :

    Polluted Water Fuels a Battle for Answers

    June 21, 10:01 a.m.

    For most of the last decade, Rev. David Hudson has pressed regulators to find out whether his town’s water contamination is related to injection wells. He’s still waiting.

    Read: Abrahm Lustgarten’s e-book,

    Hydrofracked? One Man’s Mystery Leads to a Backlash Against Natural Gas Drilling, on your Kindle or mobile device.

    Contact: e-mail: abrahm.lustgarten@propublica.org Subscribe to his twitter feed

  • How to navigate STW ™ postings:
    View monthly posting’s calendar, become a subscriber or obtain RSS feed by going to the bottom index of this page.
  • Explanation of Index:
  • This Months Postings: Calendar on left displays articles and pages posted on a given day.
  • Current and Archived Postings: Click on the month you want to view. Most current article for the month will appear at top of screen.
  • RSS Links : Obtain your RSS feeds.
  • Subscribe: Subscribe to postings by entering your e-mail address and confirming your e-mail.
  • Supporting water research and the education program’s growth of Save the Water™ is vital to our future generation’s health, your funding is needed.

    current post

    Hot Topics
    Global Water Crisis
  • Drinking Water Fears After Chemical Spill In North Bay
  • North Bay Ontario Chemical Spill/Residents Evacuated, Driver Dead, In Contamination Rollover On Highway 63
  • Canadian British Columbia Water Crisis Issues
  • Water Crisis Worsens in Hyderabad
  • Jamaican Water Issue: No need to panic! Asbestos cement pipes safe, says NWC
  • Improved but Not Always Safe: Despite Global Efforts, More Than 1 Billion People Likely at Risk for Lack of Clean Water
  • Current: European Report on Development: The Case of Lake Naivasha
    Water Contamination
  • Issue: Navy: Contaminant Found in Drinking Water at Parts of Sigonella
  • Should We Hide Low-Dose Radiation Exposures From The Public?
  • Formaldehyde Pollution Disrupts Water Supplies in Eastern Japan
  • Drinking-water wells were not contaminated by the Kalamazoo River oil spill, state report says [past related articles included]
  • Chemicals In The Water: Problems and Solutions
  • Making Endangered River Safe For Drinking. Potomac Tops List of Endangered Rivers in U.S.
  • EPA to Work with Drinking Water Systems to Monitor Unregulated Contaminants [Thomas Net News]
    Fracking
  • What Is Hydraulic Fracturing Water Usage?
  • What chemicals are used in fracking? Part I
  • Whats Fracking All About? Part 2
  • Study has has raised concerns about the safety of gas drilling in the Marcellus Shale
  • Fracking: Natural Gas Fracking Fizzles in Michigan / Includes an EPA Fracking Directory
    Fluoride
  • Where can you get all the facts about fluoride contamination?
  • Fluoride News In America [Aspen Times] & [KREX News Room]
  • OKOTOKS: Canada Fluoride News: Town Coucillors Want Oral Health Program in Place
    Questions and Answers
  • What do you need to know about chloramine-treated water?
  • What Are The True Facts About Fluoride And Your Health?
  • Chemical Spill: Formaldehyde 101: What Are The Facts?
  • “How Dangerous Is The Chemical Formaldehyde ?”
  • What Are The Facts About (Bisphenol-A) / BPA, Water And Health Risks?
  • What are some of the known water pollutants?
  • What Are Some Facts About Water? Over 100 Facts You May Not Know.
  • Savethewater Water Research and Education

    Comments Off
    Do you need quick support ?

    Welcome

    * required
    Send Message